Closest equivalent rights and adaptation

Home / European Land Registry Network / Belgium / Closest equivalent rights and adaptation

1. What are the main rights in rem arising from successions in your system?

  • Ownership : eigendom , propriété
  • Usufructus : vruchtgebruik, usufruit
  • Legal usufructus of the widow(er) : if there is no marital contract, a statutory system is applied, which is called the legal regime and confers the widow/widower usufructus.
  • Bare Ownership : Blote eigendom / nue –propriété

2. What would the role of your Land Register or registrars be in order to put in practice the principle of adaptation? What contributions could the Land Register make?

It would be wise to collaborate with notaries. They are in a way the front office.

They will have to deal with the question of conversion of an unknown right in rem into a known, registrable right in rem. Legal systems differ too much to simply accept existing rights abroad.

The Belgian system does not require registration at the moment of transition of rights due to inheritance. So, most probably the problem will only arise in the next stadium, when the property will be sold again or devided.

It’s obvious that the notary should try to convert the rights described in the foreign certificate into the closest existing equivalent right in the country where the property is situated.

Free movement of services should of course be taken into account. But in most cases it’s not likely that a foreign notary will have sufficient expertise to translate the rights described in the certificate into existing local legislation without appealing for mediation of a local notary.

The land registrars are, again in a way the back office. They should be consulted as experts in matters of land law and land registration law. The registrar could have a supervisory/ advisory role.

This site uses cookies to offer your a better browsing experience. Find out more on how we use cookies and how you can change your settings.